The question, late on purpose

Am I an avatar in someone’s game?

Elon Musk has asked, in public, whether this is base reality. CIPHER did not invent the question. It also will not let a letter-sum answer it.

Designed question · found reverse

AM I AN AVATAR IN SOMEONE’S GAME?

English reverse 420. Punctuation stripped. Apostrophe is not a letter. Ἶσις is 420 in Greek. This is not that. A wink on a public question is not a boot log.

Everyday Astronaut, “Starbase Tour with Elon Musk [PART 2 // Summer 2021],” YouTube video, August 7, 2021

Am I an avatar in someone’s game?

Play sits here, at the minute he asked it. Fate Loves is the other clip. Codex is the model. Their door is the full talk.

Reverse

MYTH

42

M 14 + Y 2 + T 7 + H 19. Already filed. MythEngine’s house-word on one modern face.

Reverse reduction

QUESTION

42

Adams hung an Answer. The word for asking reverse-reduces to 42. GAME, ordinal 26, does not lock.

MYTH reverse 42. QUESTION reverse-reduction 42. GAME misses. Same integer is not the same clothes.

A later city named two people Neo and Trinity. The English pair with AND reduces to 69. Correspondence of letters. Not assignment of souls.

The odds that we’re in base reality is one in billions.

Elon Musk · Recode Code Conference, June 2, 2016

The Argument, Separately

Philosophical simulation arguments ask whether a technologically mature civilization would run many ancestor simulations, and whether, if so, a given observer is more likely simulated than not. Nick Bostrom’s 2003 paper is the usual careful statement: it is a trilemma, not a proof that we are simulated. It depends on assumptions about substrate, motive, number of runs, and what “like us” means.

Information and computation metaphors (universe as code, physics as rendering) are older and broader than that paper. They can be productive as metaphor and overclaimed as evidence. Criticisms include: untestability, confusion of map and territory, anthropic smuggling, and the fact that “it would look like this” is available to almost any story.

What would count as evidence is a serious, unsolved problem. A repeating number in an English cipher is not on that list.

Would Cipher Matches Count?

Not by themselves. A repeated cipher match may provoke the question. Provoking a question is not establishing a claim. COMPUTER and HUMANITY both reverse-reduce to 42; that is a coincidence of one modern machine, not a boot log.

If reality were computed, what would we expect to see? A letter-sum is not on that list.

An ancient carved letter dissolving at the far edge into faint ticks, then into a field that almost, but not quite, becomes a world.

Then stop

The simulation has declined to comment.

A match is not a mechanism.

Notes

  1. Everyday Astronaut. “Starbase Tour with Elon Musk [PART 2 // Summer 2021].” YouTube video, August 7, 2021. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SA8ZBJWo73E. “Am I an avatar in someone’s game?”
  2. Not physics. CIPHER does not treat letter-sums as evidence. See Method and the Null lab.
  3. Bostrom, Nick. “Are You Living in a Computer Simulation?” Philosophical Quarterly 53, no. 211 (2003): 243–55. A trilemma, not a demonstration.
  4. Musk, Elon. Remarks at the Recode Code Conference, June 2, 2016. “The odds that we’re in base reality is one in billions.” Reported in David Roberts, “Elon Musk thinks we all live in a video game. So what if we do?,” Vox, June 3, 2016.